ddp_‘52 must-visit world attractions’
"Space should be original of 'being vanguard' not just 'better'."
<DDP Dongdaemun Design Plaza>
A place in Seoul, South Korea, was listed as one of the ‘52 must-visit places in the world’ by the New York Times in 2015. It is Dongdaemun Design Plaza DDP. Similar to the controversy caused by the Eiffel Tower in Paris, DDP faced many objections during design selection and construction. Even after the opening of the DDP, there were many negative articles about the building.
At that time, controversy began over the design-winning design of a world-famous female architect named Zaha Hadid. First of all, an architecture that has nothing to do with history. Second, it was reminiscent of a spacecraft that aliens came in.
The DDP produced many controversies from the architectural design contest to the world's attention, the desire of Korean architects, and political understanding. Eventually, the DDP was completed in 2014 and after its opening, the DDP became a place loved and admired by not only Seoulites but also people all over the world.
<The power of space_"The equivalent of visitors to the Leuvre Museum in a year">
International designers who are friends with me visit Seoul's DDP even when they have work outside of Seoul or transfer flights from Incheon. The international power is created by a single architectural space.
According to the Seoul Design Foundation, within one year of its opening, the number of visitors equivalent to one year at the Leuvre Museum in Paris has come. With the opening of DDP, the number of subway passengers at Dongdaemun History and Culture Park Station has significantly increased compared to 2013, and the surrounding commercial facilities have been activated. It is the positive power of a space that gives new experiences.
The DDP space is currently being used the most as an exhibition hall and conference hall for citizens, and there is a question as to whether the architecture is functionally suitable for the needs. When Zaha Hadid was designing, I was on a design consultant committee. Hadid had been asked to propose an exhibition system suitable for organic spaces with curves and sloping walls.
Unfortunately, a design that reflected the request in the detailed design was not submitted. Perhaps it was because the Seoul Metropolitan Government had not decided how to use the DDP building in the changing political situation at the time. Clearly, it is a space that is inherently problematic in function.
<The positive experience value of DDP architecture>
A Chanel official told me the background of Seoul's selection, and Chanel's Seoul fashion show was a very simple answer, "Because Seoul has Zaha Hadid's architecture, DDP." That's why Chanel chose Seoul for a one-day event that costs more than 10 billion won.
It is believed that fashion shows held in the space of architects with international reputations have ripple and synergy. Chanel's decision on the venue for the Asian tour was made because of the DDP, but Seoul gained international attention due to the hosting of the DDP by Chanel Cruise. The city of Seoul and DDP were promoted through SNS and YouTube of people who are involved in fashion around the world, as well as reports and promotional materials produced by Chanel.
The fact that there is a building called DDP, Seoul does not spend any money, and it has been promoted while receiving rental fees. In particular, Chanel reflected the cultural background and context of the venue in the cruise fashion show outfits, which also boosted the image of the Korean nation.
<Public Architecture 'being vanguard' Planning its impact and intangible cyclical value.>
The lesson we can learn from this is that when a country or city builds public facilities, it must check and plan the intangible circulation value that will be created after the construction is completed. In budgeting, the cost should not be simply the cost of building.
If the building that immediately comes to mind when you think of Zaha Hadid is DDP, then the decision at the time would have been the best strategic choice. Architecture or space design for space branding should be ‘being vanguard’ with differentiation. Anyone can see that you need to have a "being vanguard" image to "preoccupy" the image and increase the propagation power or ripple effect of the space.
Space should be original of 'being vanguard' not just 'better'. For leading differentiation, the focus should be on 'what to not do' rather than 'how to do'.3) That's a way to avoid trending to follow.
<5 Summaries>
"Space should be original of 'being vanguard' not just 'better'."
"The reason for the 'Chanel Cruise Collection's Fashion Show in Seoul is the DDP Architecture."
"Public architecture should be planned along with the intangible value after completion."
"Public architecture must be determined at the level of competitiveness of the national or city."
"Seoul is being branded as a competitive international city through DDP."
2) Jack Trout, jack trout on strategy, McGraw-Hill Education, 2004, pp. 16
3) Jack Trout, jack trout on strategy, McGraw-Hill Education, 2004, pp. 60
Jooyun Kim
jykim@hongik.ac.kr
Comments
Post a Comment